Friday, 16 May 2014

Hotel Babylon

In this essay I will be exploring how the scene from Hotel Babylon represents ethnicity.
            The scene starts with white men in police uniforms and a white man in a suit having a conversation. The uniforms show their authority and the suit also shows a high profession. There is then a group of men entering a building in suits; which gives the thought of authority and power. They are also in the centre of the camera; which reinforces this idea. They then talk to a woman on the desk that is also dressed in a sophisticated manner. She then turns to speak to a black man who is also dressed in a suit suggesting he is on the same professional level however he is sitting down and the high angle on him suggests he is less powerful than his colleague.
            There is then some fast paced shots to show the urgency and there is talking in a different language which reinforces the focus onto immigration. There are multiple ethnicities present but they all wear uniforms showing they have menial jobs and are not as professional or important as the British people. There is also a woman of a different ethnicity, however she is wearing a suit and panicking about the other workers which helps the viewer distinguish between legal and illegal workers and suggesting the illegal workers are less worthy.
            There is a close up of the door when the foreign, professional woman is trying to unlock it. It shows that she is panicked and rushed and shows to the audience that the emotions of the people on camera are important. It then uses close ups of peoples faces in the room which reinforces this. There is then a knock at the door and the use of a high angle shows their vulnerability and weakness. There is also dark lighting used when they are the room which creates an ominous foreboding and suggests to the viewer that something bad is going to happen to them.
            The sound at the start is quite calm and collected which shows that the people of British ethnicity are able to remain professional even at crucial times. This is contrasted with the panic present in the voices of the people from different ethnicities suggesting once again that they are more emotional than professional. It can also be seen, as the people from Britain are more cold hearted. This can also be reinforced by the way the people of different ethnicities react to the woman having a diabetic attack in contrast to the way in which the men from immigration catch Abraham.
            There is a track shot used when the workers are eating their meals after Abraham was taken. It shows that they are subdivided into their ethnicities; which suggests that they are unable to successfully integrate with other communities.

            In conclusion, this scene shows people of the British ethnicity to be more professional and more able to keep calm under pressure whereas it shows people from other ethnicities are very emotional and less important.

Sunday, 23 March 2014

Game Of Thrones extract - how class is represented


In this sequence from Game Of Thrones, different micro features combine together to portray a representation of class; which both challenges and adheres to the typical stereotypes.

The clip begins in the company of only upper class people. This can be shown by their outfits and the long shots showing which keep focus on every aspect showing that the interaction and the people are important. The lighting is also natural but quite bright which highlights their importance.


The scene then cuts to some upper class people walking through the streets and surrounded by lower class people. There is a low angle shot on the lower class people and a high angle shot juxtaposed on King Joffery and his people. This is a counter stereotype as it suggests that the lower class have the most power in this situation and King Joffery, although superior in title, is weaker and vulnerable. This counteracts the usual stereotype of a higher class having all the power. The diegetic sound is also more prominent with the arrival of people from the lower class. They chant and mock the king; which shows their lack of respect for authority and is also quite un-stereotypical. The lack of dialogue between the upper class and the prevalent dialogue when the lower class people are there suggests that the lower class have a sense of community and communication whereas the upper class are more preserved and have a lack of integration.


There is also a shift in atmosphere when the lower class citizens come into the scene as they are all quite angry and violent which re-enforces the stereotype that they are quite savage and cannot control their emotions. This is also supported by the fight that they started in which the shots then become shorter and more fast paced. During this time, there, there is a range of different shots used. When the upper class are shown, it is mostly with close ups and medium close ups to show their faces and suggests the importance of their emotions and responses to the events. This is different to when the lower class are shown in mostly long shots and medium shots which suggests that their emotions are not as important and allows the viewer to focus mainly on their actions when they're rebelling which suggests them to be savage and incapable of emotion.


Throughout this scene, the representation of class has stuck to stereotypes but has also criticized them. It shows the authority of the upper class but also lower class challenging this with their lack of respect. The fact that the upper class dominates most of the screen time also suggests that they are more important than the lower class; which sticks with the current stereotype.



Dr Who answer

I reviewed an answer wrote by a student in the 2009 exam in which the clip was from Dr Who. I reviewed Candidate A's answer and decided that it would be a level 4 answer. It was interesting to read someone else's take on the scene and it's representation of gender as it helped me to see things I had not originally picked up on and it also gave me an idea of how to structure my answer.

Todorov and Propp

Todorov

Todorov suggested that conventional narratives are structured in 5 stages


  1. A state of equilibrium at the outset
  2. A disruption of the equilibrium by some action
  3. A recognition that there has been a disruption
  4. An attempt to repair the disruption
  5. A reinstatement of the equilibrium
This type of narrative structure is very familiar to us and can be applied to many mainstream film narratives.

Propp

Propp suggested there are 8 'stock' characters

  1. The villian who struggles against the hero
  2. The dispatcher who sends the hero off
  3. The helper who helps the hero in their quest
  4. The princess who the hero deserves but cannot marry her because of the villain
  5. Her father who gives the hero the task/identifies the false hero
  6. The donor who prepares the hero or gives them a magic object
  7. The hero who reacts to the donor and marries the princess
  8. The false hero who takes credit for hero's actions and tries to marry the princess
The hero's journey often ends when he defeats the villain and marries the princess

*both use folk law*

Representation of gender - 10th March

Male
rebellious
reckless
masculinity
strength
powerful
in control
superior

Female
beauty
inferior
sex icon
housework
submissive
victim
need a man
OBJECTIFIED

Barthes said masculinity/femininity were created by society


  • ideology
  • stereotype
  • representation - re-presenting an image
  • Laura Mulvey
Representation

  • Describes the signs that stand in for and take the place of something else
  • It is through representation that people know and understand the world and reality through the act of naming it. Signs are manipulated in order to make sense of the world.
Re-present

mise en scene
sound
camera shots
framed composition
resemble - signs/signifier

we pay attention to these biased interpretations of reality to make sense of reality

making sense of reality - realism - verisimilitude

signs help us decipher what exactly is being represented. i.e - glasses + bow tie + pocket protector = nerd




Friday, 7 March 2014

3rd March

cross cutting and parallel editing clarification:

Cross cutting: Cutting between different sets of scenes occurring simultaneously or at different times. 
used: to build suspense or show relationship between the different sets of action

Parallel editing: Two or more simultaneous sets of action to unfold within a single film sequence.
uses multiple point of view shots
= tension
Two different stories happening at the same time

What is a stereotype?

An oversimplified representation of a social group



clothing:
young - jeans, joggers, skinny jeans
old - cardigan, suits, skin coloured tights
FASHION











Friday, 28 February 2014

28th Feb

mid-shot: from hips to head
medium close up: from shoulders to head
medium two shot: shoulder to head with 2 people
close up: from neck upwards
wide shot: shows setting more locally - narrow view of an establishing shot
establishing shot: shows you where its set
long shot: full body shot of a person
cantered/dutch: camera tilted on an angle

Steadicam - harnessed to body, creates seamless movement. counteracts body movement
Handheld - camera held manually - rare in TV drama